III. INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION

Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. Ensuring transparency in investor-state dispute resolution under

the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.

http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=1428

Bolton, P and G. Hendrix. Atlanta’s international arbitration initiative: an interview with Glenn

Hendrix.

http://www.globalatlanta.com/articlevid/24737/1461

Chaturvedi, S. and C. Agrawal. Jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction.

77:2:201-210, 2011.

Chung, Rom K. L. The rules of natural justice in arbitration.

2011.

Das, R. and A. Keyal. Judicial intervention in international arbitration.

(Kolkata, India) 2:585-605, October-December 2009.

Franck, S. D. Rationalizing costs in investment treaty arbitration.

review

Gélinas, F. The independence of international arbitrators and judges: tampered with or well

tempered?

Hanotiau, B. International arbitration in a global economy: the challenges of the future.

Journal of international arbitration

2011.

Haydn-Williams, J. International commercial arbitration in Barbados.

77:2:184-196, 2011.

Huang, L. W. Which treaties reign supreme?: the dormant supremacy clause effect of

implemented non-self-executing treaties.

2258, 2011.

Hughes, B. The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Korea.

law practicum

Jones, D. International arbitration: navigating the arbitral institutions and venues.

International law practicum

Oda, Hiroshi. Enforcement and setting aside of foreign arbitral awards in Japan.

International Court of Arbitration bulletin

Reilly, L. Harmonisation of Irish arbitration law: Arbitration Act 2010.

arbitration

Rich, D. A. Deference to the “Law of Nations”: the intersection between the New York

Convention, the Convention Act, the McCarran-Ferguson Act, and state anti-insurance

arbitration statutes.

Rights of the host states within the system of international investment protection.

yearbook of international law

BIBLIOGRAPHY – May 2011

Confidentiality and publicity in investment arbitration, public interest and scope of

powers vested in arbitral tribunals / A. J. B

decisions concerning recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: a threat to

sovereignty of the states or an overestimated hazard (so far)? (with emphasis on the

developments within the international investment arbitration setting) / L. Guglya, p. 93-

121 -- On the availability of counterclaims in investment treaty arbitration / P. Lalive

and L. Halonen, p. 141-156 -- New UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules / P. Nowaczyk, p. 320-

326.

Suh, M. M. and D. L. Trembly. Section 1782 discovery in international arbitration: factors to

consider in light of U.S. case law.

February-April 2011.

The relationship between constitutional values, human rights and arbitration.

european) yearbook of arbitration

Regulatory framework and characteristics of arbitration judicature in Poland / B.

Banaszak and

heard / M. Damjan, p. 71-86 -- Constitutional environment and the phenomenon of

arbitration / K. Klíma, p. 147-160.

Torgbor, E. Ghana outdoors: the new Alternative Dispute Resolution Act 2010 (Act 798): a

brief appraisal.

United Nations. UNCITRAL arbitration rules (as revised in 2010). New York, United Nations,

2011. 30 p. Published in all official languages of the United Nations.

Wagner, P. K. Arbitration in Germany.

2010.

Yang, Ing Loong. Enforcement of arbitral awards: the Taiwanese perspective.

review